Szukaj na tym blogu

niedziela, 22 listopada 2015

LAKTOFERYNA

LAKTOFERYNA
Przeciwbakteryjne działanie laktoferyny -Eva Sapi - twierdzi ze działa na rozne biofilmy.Natomiast przy chorobie z Lyme utrudnia tworzenie się biofilmu.Stezenie 5% Laktoferyny  dziala bardziej skutecznie  jak Doxycyklina na biofilm.Sa potrzebne dodatkowe badania.Porownanie do antybiotykow.

link do badan nad Laktoferyna

http://www.newhaven.edu/887913.pdf.
---------------------------------
Laktoferyna występuje w płynach ustrojowych i wydzielinach ssaków, przede wszystkim w mleku pierwszym (siarze), ślinie, łzach, czyli wszędzie tam, gdzie istnieje konieczność zapewnienia szybkiej obrony przeciwdrobnoustrojowej. Laktoferyna występuje także w neutrofilach. Jej nazwa pochodzi od połączenia łacińskich wyrazów mleczny (lacto) i żelazo (ferrum), charakteryzującą wysokie podobieństwo opisywanego białka do żelaza [5]. Zdolność do wiązania żelaza jest zresztą jedną z kluczowych właściwości laktoferyny, umożliwiającą jej pełnienie wielorakich aktywności w organizmie.

Wspomniane powinowactwo z żelazem czyni z laktoferyny idealny regulator układu immunologicznego i stymulator odporności. Wynika to z faktu, iż patogeny do wzrostu i rozwoju potrzebują dostępu do żelaza w środowisku. Laktoferyna, wiążąc dostępne jony opisywanego pierwiastka, uniemożliwia więc drobnoustrojom patogennym rozmnażanie, wywierając jednocześnie  działanie bakteriostatyczne lub bakteriobójcze. Nie jest to jedyny mechanizm, w którym laktoferyna wywiera efekt przeciwbakteryjny. Wykazano bowiem jej zdolność do wiązania się do ściany komórkowej, co powoduje wypływ zawartości wewnątrzkomórkowej i śmierci komórki bakteryjnej.

Podobnie hamujące działanie laktoferyna wywiera względem wirusów. Białko to hamuje możliwość przyłączania się patogenów do komórki gospodarza (blokowanie dostępnych receptorów), przez co wirus nie może wniknąć do wnętrza komórki. Opisane mechanizmy działania laktoferyny uniemożliwiają namnażanie patogenów – zarówno bakterii, jak i wirusów – na początkowym etapie infekcji [6, 7, 8]. Należy jednak zaznaczyć, iż laktoferyna odgrywa istotną rolę odpornościową także podczas już trwającej infekcji bakteryjnej lub wirusowej.

Badania wykazały bowiem, iż na etapie aktywnego zakażenia laktoferyna wywiera stymulujący wpływ na cały układ immunologiczny, stymulując poszczególne jego elementy do przyspieszonego dojrzewania. Dzięki tej właściwości aktywowana jest szybsza i aktywniejsza odpowiedź układu immunologicznego. Co więcej, patogeny są sprawnie usuwane z ustroju na drodze wzmacniania procesu fagocytozy przez laktoferynę [9].

Wielotorowy mechanizm działania laktoferyny jest jej olbrzymią zaletą. Sama tylko chelatacja jonów żelaza nie wystarczy bowiem do zahamowania wzrostu wszystkich bakterii chorobotwórczych. Niektóre z nich produkują związki chelatujące żelazo (siderofory), o wyższym powinowactwie z tym pierwiastkiem niż laktoferyna. Przykładem takich drobnoustrojów są m.in. Helicobacter pylorii [10]. Mechanizm hamowania wzrostu patogenów polega wówczas na wiązaniu się opisywanego białka do ściany komórkowej bakterii i w konsekwencji wypływie jonów z komórki i jej uszkodzeniu.

Nie są to jednak jedyne mechanizmy, na drodze których laktoferyna eliminuje niepożądane patogeny z ustroju. Wspomnieć należy również o jej zdolności do obniżania właściwości adhezyjnych drobnoustrojów patogennych do komórek. W konsekwencji przyleganie drobnoustrojów i następczy rozwój infekcji jest silnie utrudniony. Zmniejszona adhezyjność osiągana jest na drodze zwiększonej ruchliwości bakterii, co wynika z działania laktoferyny. W konsekwencji zdolność patogenów do tworzenia briofilów bakteryjnych jest znacznie bardziej ograniczona, co ułatwia ich usunięcie z organizmu.

Należy podkreślić, iż biofilm (czyli skupisko komórek bakteryjnych) jest formą funkcjonowania, która zwiększa szansę drobnoustrojów na przeżycie dzięki wytworzeniu warstwy zewnętrznej,  zapewniającej odporność na działanie antybiotyków i innych środków antybakteryjnych. Innymi słowy, biofilm bakteryjny jest znacznie bardziej sprzyjającą przetrwaniu bakterii formą niż forma wolnoszczepowa [11]. Działanie przeciwbakteryjne jest więc wywierane wielotorowo. Dzięki tak silnym właściwościom obronnym laktoferyny jest ona jednym z głównych elementów odpornościowym w mleku ssaków. To właśnie dzięki podaży laktoferyny obecnej w wysokim stężeniu w mleku matki noworodek o jeszcze nie w pełni wykształconej odporności otrzymuje silną linię obrony przed czynnikami zakaźnymi pochodzącymi ze środowiska zewnętrznego.

Uważa się, iż to właśnie wysoka zawartość laktoferyny w mleku kobiecym sprawia, iż noworodki karmione naturalnie mają istotnie wyższą odporność i są mniej podatne na zakażenie ogólnoustrojowe (sepsę). Odmiennie, noworodki karmione mlekiem modyfikowanym nie otrzymują odpowiedniej ilości laktoferyny [1]. Co więcej, mieszanki mlekozastępcze wzbogacane są w żelazo, będące pożywką dla drobnoustrojów, stymulujące ich namnażanie, co zwiększa ryzyko rozwoju zakażenia.

Jeśli nawet mleko modyfikowane wzbogacone jest w laktoferynę, stopień jej wysycenia żelazem jest nieznany, co zmniejsza jej działanie antagonistyczne względem patogenów. Widać tu olbrzymią rolę laktoferyny w zapewnieniu ochrony u noworodków i niemowląt [1]. Jak uprzednio wspomniano, laktoferyna występuje także w innych płynach ustrojowych i wydzielinach oraz tkankach, gdzie odgrywa przede wszystkim rolę miejscowej ochrony. Wiążąc dostępne w danym rejonie organizmu żelazo, uniemożliwia rozwój lokalnego zakażenia [12]

1. Gajda-Morszewski P., Śpiewak K. Laktoferyna – białko multipotencjalne. Zeszyty Naukowe Towarzystwa Doktorantow UJ Nauki Ścisłe, Nr 10 (1/2015).
2. Naidu A.S. Lactoferrin: natural, multifunctional, antimicrobial. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 2000; 1–2.
3. Farnaud S., Evans R.W. Lactoferrin – a multifunctional protein with antimicrobial properties. Mol. Immunol. 2003; 40 (7): 395–405.
4. Sanchez L., Calvo M., Brock J.H. Biological role of lactoferrin. Arch. Dis. Child. 1992; 67 (5): 657–61.
5. Groves M.L. The Isolation of a Red Protein from Milk. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1960; 82 (13): 33–45.
6. Beddek A.J., Schryvers A.B. The Lactoferrin Receptor Complex in Gram Negative Bacteria, BioMetals 2010, No. 23 (3), 377–386.
7. Berlutti F. et al. Antiviral properties of Lactoferrin/-A Natural Immunity Molecule, Molecules 2011, No. 16 (8), 6992–7012.
8. Al-Sheikh H. Effect of Lactoferrin and Iron on the Growth of Human Pathogenic Candida Species, Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 2009, No. 12 (1), 91–94.
9. Sanchez L., Calvo M., Brock J.H. Biological role of lactoferrin. Arch. Dis. Child. 1992; 67 (5): 657–61.
10. Farnaud S.J.C. et al. Saliva: Physiology and Diagnostic Potential in Health and Disease, The Scientific World Journal 2010, No. 10, 434–456.
11. Godoy-Gallardo M. et al. Covalent Immobilization of hLf1-11 Peptide on a Titanium Surface Reduces Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation. Acta Biomaterialia 2014, No. 10 (8), 3522–3534.
12. Artym J., Laktoferyna – niezwykłe białko, Warszawa 2012, 258.
13. Godoy-Gallardo M. et al. Covalent Immobilization of hLf1-11 Peptide on a Titanium Surface Reduces Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation, Acta Biomaterialia 2014, No. 10 (8), 3522–3534.
14. Brouwer C.P.J.M., Rahman M., Welling M.M., Discovery and Development of a Synthetic Peptide Derived from Lactoferrin for Clinical Use, Peptides 2011, No. 32 (9), 1953–1963.
15. 15. Artym J., Berlutti F. et al. Antiviral properties of Lactoferrin/-A Natural Immunity Molecule, Molecules 2011, No. 16 (8), 6992–7012; Strate van der B.W.A. et al. Antiviral Activities of Lactoferrin, Antiviral Research 2010, No. 52 (3), 225–239.
16. Małaczewska J., Rotkiewicz Z., Lactoferrin – A Multipotential Protein, Medycyna Weterynaryjna 2007, nr 63 (2), 136–139.
17. Strate van der B.W.A. et al. Antiviral Activities of Lactoferrin, Antiviral Research 2010, No. 52 (3), 225–239.
18. Wakabayashi H. et al. Lactoferrin for Prevention of Common Viral Infections, Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2014, No. 20 (11), 666–671.
19. Strate van der B.W.A. et al. Antiviral Activities of Lactoferrin, Antiviral Research 2010, No. 52 (3), 225–239.

http://food-forum.pl/artykul/701/laktoferyna-panaceum-na-infekcje.html
------------------------------

Lactoferrin as a Natural Immune Modulator Jeffrey K. Actor,1,* Shen-An Hwang,1 and Marian L. Kruzel2

Abstract


Lactoferrin, an iron-binding glycoprotein, is a cell-secreted mediator that bridges innate and adaptive immune function in mammals. It is a pleiotropic molecule that directly assists in the influence of presenting cells for the development of T-helper cell polarization. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of research regarding the role of lactoferrin in maintaining immune homeostasis, in particular as a mediator of immune responses to infectious assault, trauma and injury. These findings are critically relevant in the development of both prophylactic and therapeutic interventions in humans. Understanding these particular effects of lactoferrin will provide a logical framework for determining its role in health and disease.
 
------------
CONCLUSIONS
 
Lactoferrin is a key element to combat excessive inflammation and direct host immune function to protect against overaggressive microbial insults. Found in exocrine secretions, lactoferrin serves as a natural regulator of host defense. It is one of the first factors released by neutrophils upon encounter with pathogens and contributes to innate activation by directing development of adaptive responses. In combination with its historical role in limiting microbial proliferation and functioning as a direct microbicidal agent, lactoferrin plays a central role in host immunity. Lactoferrin has the ability to modulate cytokine production from monocytes, as well as from lymphocytes, during activation from foreign stimuli or mitogens. In addition, along with co-stimulatory mediators, lactoferrin can modulate chemokine recognition and lymphocyte migratory potential. This, coupled with the ability to affect production and activity of reactive oxygen species, allows lactoferrin to serve as a unique regulator to a wide array of responses, including those involved in septic shock (e.g. systemic inflammatory response syndrome), inflammation, and subsequent development of disease related pathologies.
 
---------------------------
Neutrophil-macrophage cooperation in the host defence against mycobacterial infections
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2770507

Activation of macrophages by lactoferrin: secretion of TNF-alpha, IL-8 and NO
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9315285
--------------------------
"Examples of specific bacteria inhibited by lactoferrin include: Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Helicobacter pylori, all of which are capable of causing serious illness. While many studies have involved observations of lactoferrin's effects on microbial growth in a laboratory dish or test tube, recent research in Japan has demonstrated that, when administered orally to mice, bovine-derived lactoferrin causes a marked reduction in the proliferation of intestinal bacteria, including several strains of the pathogenic bacterium, Clostridium. Furthermore, when administered to laboratory animals, lactoferrin also decreases the number of bacteria that translocate, or pass through, the cell lining of the intestines. Translocation of bacteria through the intestinal epithelium is a means by which bacteria can gain access to the blood and lymphatic system, and, if they are not checked by the body's immune system, infections and illness ensueAs mentioned previously, lactoferrin also inhibits several species of fungi and certain parasites. Fungi inhibited by lactoferrin include Candida albicans, the form of yeast normally present to some extent in all individuals, but responsible for 'yeast infections,' or aggressive fungal overgrowth. The mechanism by which lactoferrin inhibits some parasites maybe via stimulation of the process of phagocytosis, whereby immune cells engulf and digest foreign organisms.
http://intelegen.com/ImmuneSystem/lactoferrin.htm"



When fed to adult animals and human infants, lactoferrin showed a dramatic increase in good micro flora—such as bifidus—and a decrease in bad bacteria, such as E. coli, streptococcus, clostridium and others..Some research also suggests that lactoferrin is able to stimulate intestinal cell growth and may lead to better digestive functions, in addition to its ability to enhance the growth of “good” microflora in the intestine."
http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2000/oct2000_report_lactoferrin.html

"Most milk allergies are caused by an allergy to whey protein, the most abundant milk protein, or lactose, the most abundant milk sugar. Lactoferrin, on the other hand, is a very minor component of milk, and it is very unlikely that your child will be allergic to lactoferrin."
http://eu-es.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=54858283139&topic=8049

"C. krusei being more sensitive to lactoferrin (c 1.4 times) than C. albicans. All 20 oral isolates of C. krusei were susceptible to lactoferrin."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9393559

"Five oral isolates each of Candida albicans and Candida krusei were studied for their sensitivity to the fungicidal effect of human lactoferrin. Significant inter- and intraspecies variations were observed and with most isolates the sensitivity of C. krusei to lactoferrin was greater than that of C. albicans. Fungicidal activity of lactoferrin was dose-dependent and observable only with the irondashfree form of the molecule (apo-lactoferrin). Irondashsaturated lactoferrin was ineffective against all isolates
.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8141667

"Thus, BLF was fungicidal for the six Candida species in the following decreasing order, C. tropicalis > C. krusei > C. albicans > C. guilliermondii > C. parapsilosis > C. glabrata; the latter being the most resistant."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10200932

"Only iron free apo-lactoferrin was effective in inhibiting Candida in this study. Lactoferrin prevented Candida turning hyphal (in absence of iron). Effective for a number of isolates of C. albicans, krusei and tropicalis."
http://scialert.net/pdfs/pjbs/2009/91-94.pdf

"In this study, bovine holo-lactoferrin, but not apo-lactoferrin stimulated L. Acidophilus. Both forms of lactoferrin increased numbers of B. breve, B. infantis and B. bifidum, but neither affected B. longum."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15222478

"Lactoferrin, an iron-binding protein, is a vital element to the human body in that it is specifically utilized to retrieve iron from the foods we ingest, and then deliver the iron wherever it is needed by the body.On the other hand, when iron is carried through the body by lactoferrin, as it is meant to be, greater than 95% of it is assimilable. The lactoferrin carries the iron directly to the specific receptor sites in the body where iron is meant to be absorbed and utilized. And because it is attached to lactoferrin, the iron cannot be absorbed and utilized by the bacteria, viruses, yeasts and other harmful parasites that require it for their metabolism. These harmful organisms are simply unable to capture and utilize iron in the presence of lactoferrin!"
http://www.upwardquest.com/nutrition.b-lymphocytes.html

"A study published in July 2009 examined the effects of lactoferrin versus an iron supplement (ferrous sulfate) in a group of pregnant women with anemia. This is an especially sensitive population. The risk of digestive complications and the added importance of adherence to treatment is particularly important during this time. 100 expectant mothers participated in the study. Half received 100 mg of lactoferrin twice daily, while the remainder were given 520 mg of ferrous sulfate once a day (providing about 100 mg of actual iron). (4) After 30 days of treatment, both groups demonstrated similar increases in serum ferritin, hemoglobin and iron.An Italian experiment from 2006 supports these current findings. That study followed 300 women and employed the same dosage of both iron and lactoferrin (520 mg daily vs. 100 mg twice daily). This 30 day trial actually found that lactoferrin outperformed ferrous sulfate by increasing values of hemoglobin and “total serum iron” to a greater extent. Once again, lactoferrin was superior in that it didn’t provoke adverse reactions. Based on the currently available evidence, a recent scientific review suggests that lactoferrin can be considered in certain cases of pregnancy related iron deficiency."
http://www.healthyfellow.com/309/lactoferrin-and-anemia/

Inhibited hyphal growth in azole resistant strains of Candida
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9660988

Lactoferrin peptide synergistic with fluconazole
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC149030/?tool=pmcentrez

Lactoferrin was synergistic with amphotericin and fluconazole
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10543740

Adding lactoferrin to polyene antifungals (nystatin, amphotericin) was not as effective as the azoles.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8985937

It was found that TLF acted synergistically with amphotericin B and fluconazole against C. albicans.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18719181

"We conclude that a lactoferrin-containing mouthwash has fungistatic properties, may be fungicidal to C. krusei and may be a candidate for the treatment and prevention of oral and esophageal candidiasis."
http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/ma?f=102251951.html"

Synergistic inhibitory effects on Candida growth were found for combinations of lactoferrin and fluconazole or amphotericin B, irrespective of the medium type and pH, or the addition of saliva."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12076264

This study showed that Blf increased IL-18 in intestinal epithelial cells.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11525597

In this study of mice, it was found feeding IL-18 restored TH1 immunity to Candida.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC101755/

This study provides more evidence of lactoferrin increasing intestinal immunity. Strongly increased CD4T helper cells in the small intestine.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11050473

Low levels of CD4 helper cells are associated with candidiasis
.http://www.naturalstandard.com/inde.../monographs/allergies/allergy-candidiasis.asp

Further evidence of the important role of CD4 in candidiasis.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11796605

"Hence, dietary rhLF is digested in the upper GI tract and does not reach the colon."
http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/132/9/2597

"Another problem with Candida overgrowth is that it sticks to mucosal linings and spreads like a weed. A study with vaginal mucosal lining cells showed that lactoferrin not only significantly reduces Candida from sticking; it actually helps detach Candida if it has already latched on. This finding is likely to apply to other mucosal linings such as the lungs, sinuses, and digestive tract."
http://www.wellnessresources.com/tips/articles/lactoferrin_keeping_candida_friendly/"

In a recent study, researchers have discovered a protein in human tears, mucus, sweat, and milk that blocks biofilms from growing. The protein lactoferrin discourages bacteria from clumping into biofilms. Lactoferrin stimulates 'twitching,' which causes the bacteria to wander around rather than form harmful clusters.Pradeep K. Singh, of the University of Iowa College of Medicine in Iowa City, led the study that was published in Nature. He and colleagues hypothesize that lactoferrin's affinity for iron prohibits biofilm growth. Lactoferrin acts as a signal: It tells bacteria that iron is in short supply, an essential nutrient for biofilms. Therefore, the bacteria go elsewhere to build their elaborate homes."
http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/06_02/biofilms.shtml

Biotene (contains lactoferrin) plus Sporanox cured unresponsive oral thrush
http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline/...e_response_of_severe,_refractory_oral.23.aspx

"We conclude that after oral administration, substantial amounts of apoLF and holoLF survive gastric transit."
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/451855.html

"When fighting infection or a specific condition, take a dosage of one capsule three times per day (750mg total) ; for maintenance take one capsule per day."
http://www.gutdoctor.com/products/30

"As a food supplement or for maintenance, Apo-Lactoferrin is most often advised in dosage from 250 - 500 mg per day. For therapeutic effects, Apo-Lactoferrin powder is given at high dosage of 1-3 grams per day preferably divided in 3 applications per day. Substantially higher dosage is sometimes advised for body builders and athletes (3-6 grams) or for treating hepatitis C or a disorder related to nutritional deficiency (2-4 grams)"
http://www.benseng.com/product/product-lactoferrine-apo-en.html

This is the study that looked at bLF increasing IL-18.“.... doses of 100 or 300 mg/kg/day for seven successive days”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11525597

This trial used 1.8g-3.6g/day to treat hepatitis C.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10363572

Effective in treating H. pylori in humans. The bLF group received bLF tablets at a dosage of 200 mg b.i.d. (400mg/day) for a period of 12 weeks. The study showed significant inhibition of H. Pylori, compared to placebo, however only 32% responded. This suggests to me that 400mg/day was sub optimal, and that a higher dose would have achieved better results.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16369731

"Improvement of immune regulation calls for a dosage ranging from 200 to 400 milligrams. I haven’t run across doses higher than 1400 milligrams a day except in cases where a doctor was going after an actual infection. One interesting example of this was with a patient suffering from gastritis that was likely caused by H-pylori bacteria. After a course of treatment with high-dose lactoferrin, there was a complete clearance of all symptoms. While we haven’t seen any problems with taking larger doses, one animal study using very large doses led to some damage to the gastro mucosa. In terms of human feed-back, lactoferrin is a relatively benign substance, though if one takes too much it could lead to some diarrhea or a drop in energy. Reduce the dose if this occurs.
http://intelegen.com/ImmuneSystem/lactoferrin_coordinating_the_hum.htm

"At what time of the day should these be taken? Lactoferrin is a physiological replenishment. It can be taken anytime of the day. Is it better to take them with food? If convenient - yes."
http://www.ybhurtn.biz/Lactoferrin_Gold_1.php

"For maximum absorption, lactoferrin should be taken before meals or on an empty stomach."
http://www.medhelp.org/user_journals/show/14682/Lactoferrin

".... with or without meals."
http://www.health-marketplace.com/Lactoferrin.htm

"between meals"
http://www3.shopping.com/xPO-Ecological-Formulas-Lactoferrin-100-mg-60-capsules-Ecological-Formulas

"Capsules should be taken on an empty stomach with a large glass of tepid water (approximately 300ml)."
http://www.gutdoctor.com/products/30

"taken in one dose at bedtime. This is the most common time to take this for immune regulation purposes and will not interfere with sleep in any way."
http://intelegen.com/ImmuneSystem/lactoferrin_coordinating_the_hum.htm

Summary:Only apo-lactoferrin is effective against Candida. Synergistic with other antifungals. Fungicidal (not fungistatic) against most (all?) strains of Candida, including the hard to treat C. krusei. Prevents Candida turning hyphal. Prevents biofilms from forming and may break down existing biofilms. Detaches Candida from mucosal linings. Stimulates Th1 immune response (IL-18, CD4) against Candida in small intestine, potentially not only helping kill off Candida, but preventing future relapse (if you keep taking lactoferrin). It is effective in treating H. pylori gastritis. It kills a number of pathogenic bacteria, viruses and parasites. Stimulates growth of good bacteria such as Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria. It does not contain casein so will not cause a milk allergy. Lots of in vitro laboratory research, and in vivo with animals, but very little data on use with humans, especially with intestinal candidiasis, so unfortunately it is still unproven for that use. The effective dosage for treating intestinal Candida is unknown. There is also conflicting information on when to take doses.Bottom line:Although it's not proven to cure intestinal candidiasis, I think apo-lactoferrin has a big potential upside and no apparent downside. I get a big die-off from only one capsule (300mg) of apo-lactoferrin. I intend gradually increasing to 8 caps/day. This will mean I will be ingesting 2.4g of lactoferrin a day, which is the same amount of lactoferrin the average breast fed newborn baby consumes.
----------------------------
Here is what I am observing at the moment and will be modified as time moves on:

1/ Lactoferrin needs to be 100% Lactoferrin. Currently Jarrow is the product used so far - as far as I can tell it appears to be generic - that is perhaps any form could be utilized. Symbiotics called me and stated that they have a patented lacto that is being used in MRSA patients by hospitals.

Dosage of lactoferrin: I started with 250mg once per day and after 2 weeks have moved up to 500mg 1x per day and have also used a total of 750mg total  **update 12/1/2011:  this appears to be causing problems for some people in that the die off is too strong - best to cut back the dose and move up slowly.  Perhaps using 1/2 of a cap (125mg) is a better starting point.

2/ Xylitol. I am currently using NOW xylitol - which appears to be generic. Dosage: 1 to 2 teaspoons. This could likely change.  


https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/pptu/lactoferrin-xylitol-protocol-t4286592.html
---------------------------------
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Brak komentarzy:

Prześlij komentarz